Argumentative Essay Writing Exercises: Level B2 (with Answers)

The transition 'In fact' is the best choice because it introduces supporting evidence that reinforces the claim just made. 'However' introduces contrast, 'Nevertheless' signals concession, and 'For instance' introduces a specific example rather than factual support.

This is true. The thesis statement belongs in the introduction, where it establishes the writer's central argument. It serves as a guide for the reader and for the rest of the essay.

'Governments should invest in renewable energy because it reduces carbon emissions, creates jobs, and decreases dependence on foreign oil' is the strongest thesis because it presents a clear, arguable position and outlines three specific reasons that will be developed in the essay. The other options are too vague, factual, or lack a clear argumentative stance.

The hook grabs the reader's attention, the counterargument presents the opposing view, the thesis statement states the writer's central claim, and the call to action urges the reader to act based on the argument presented.

This option contains a structural error because a strong argumentative conclusion should restate the thesis, summarise the key points, and include a call to action. Instead, it is vague, fails to take a clear position, and does not reference any arguments made in the essay.

'According to recent research,' is the best transition because it smoothly introduces statistical evidence to support the preceding claim. 'On the other hand' signals contrast, 'As a result' implies causation from a previous point, and 'In other words' signals a restatement rather than new evidence.

The original sentence is a fragment because 'Although' introduces a subordinate clause that is never completed with an independent clause. Removing 'Although' creates two independent clauses properly joined by 'and,' forming a complete and clear argumentative statement.

A well-structured argumentative essay introduction begins with a hook to capture the reader's attention, followed by background information to provide context, then the thesis statement presenting the main argument, and finally a brief outline of the supporting points to be discussed.

The option beginning with a thought-provoking question engages the reader immediately, provides relevant context, and leads naturally into the essay's argument. The other options are too informal, too personal, or lack the engaging quality expected in academic writing.

A counterargument presents the opposing viewpoint that challenges the writer's thesis, while a rebuttal is the writer's response that disproves or weakens that opposing viewpoint. They serve different but complementary roles in strengthening an argument.

'Research consistently demonstrates that access to green spaces significantly improves mental health outcomes in urban populations' uses formal academic register with precise vocabulary. The other options are too informal, use slang, or include conversational phrasing inappropriate for academic writing.

This is false. A strong argumentative essay acknowledges and addresses counterarguments. By presenting and then refuting opposing views, the writer demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic and strengthens their own position.

By acknowledging the opposing view first and then presenting counterevidence, the writer demonstrates awareness of the debate and strengthens their credibility. This technique shows the reader that the writer has considered multiple perspectives before reaching their conclusion.

'Furthermore, the financial burden of school uniforms disproportionately affects low-income families' is the best improvement because it uses a formal transition, precise vocabulary, and a clear topic sentence that advances the argument. The other options remain too informal, vague, or poorly structured.