Trusted by 10M+ learners worldwide — free lessons, tools & games
Forums Download App Go ad-free ⚡ Go Pro ★ Become a Club Host
Login Sign up free

Circular Reasoning Writing Exercises: Level C1-C2 (with Answers)

15questions
7:30minutes
+22XP on pass

Track your Circular Reasoning progress with 15 exercises at Level C1-C2. Take the quiz today, note your score, and retake it next week to see how much you have improved. Every question includes a full explanation so each attempt teaches you something new.

Review the lesson first

⏱ You have 07:30 to answer 15 questions. The timer only starts when you click Begin.

Ads paying for your free English lessons. Prefer a quiet page? Go ad-free

Questions 15
Q1  15
Q1 15

Question 1: What fallacy is demonstrated in the following argument? 'The CEO's strategy is brilliant because a brilliant leader like her would only devise brilliant strategies.'

Question 1 options
This is circular reasoning (also called begging the question) because the argument's conclusion — that the strategy is brilliant — is supported only by restating the same claim in different words, namely that the leader is brilliant and therefore produces brilliant strategies. No independent evidence is offered.
Q2 15

Question 2: In a critical-thinking essay, a student writes: 'The senator's policy will reduce poverty because implementing it will lead to less poverty.' The instructor notes that this is an example of ___ in argumentative writing.

Question 2 options
The sentence restates the conclusion as the premise — claiming the policy reduces poverty because it leads to less poverty — which is circular reasoning (begging the question). No external evidence supports the claim.
Q3 15

Question 3: Circular reasoning is fallacious because the premise and the conclusion are essentially the same claim, meaning no independent evidence is actually provided to support the argument.

Question 3 options
This is true. Circular reasoning (begging the question) fails as a logical argument precisely because the conclusion is merely a restatement of the premise, so nothing new is proven.
Q4 15

Question 4: Which of the following sentences is a clear example of circular reasoning?

Question 4 options
The statement 'This hospital is the finest in the region because no other hospital in the region is as good' restates the same idea — being the finest and no other being as good are identical claims. The other options contain independent (though possibly weak) evidence, introduce irrelevant attacks, or shift the topic, making them different fallacies.
Q5 15

Question 5: Match each logical fallacy to its correct definition or characteristic.

Question 5 options
Circular reasoning
Ad hominem
Straw man
Red herring
The conclusion merely restates the premise
Introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention
Distorts an opponent's argument to refute it
Attacks the person instead of the argument

Select an item on the left, then tap its match on the right.

Circular reasoning restates the conclusion as the premise. Ad hominem attacks the person rather than the argument. A straw man distorts the opponent's position. A red herring introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention.
Q6 15

Question 6: Which of the following arguments contains a logical fallacy of circular reasoning?

Question 6 options
'Organic produce is healthier because eating organic is better for your health' simply restates the same claim in different words, which is circular reasoning. The other sentences commit different fallacies: appeal to popularity, slippery slope, and hasty generalisation, respectively.
Q7 15

Question 7: A philosophy student writes the following in an essay: 'Democracy is the ideal form of governance ___.' Which concluding clause would make the argument circular?

Question 7 options
The clause 'because it represents the most ideal way to govern a society' simply restates the premise — that democracy is ideal — using slightly different words, which makes the argument circular. The other options provide independent (though debatable) reasons.
Q8 15

Question 8: The following argument appears in a persuasive essay: 'Professor Lin's research is credible because she is a credible researcher.' Which option correctly fixes the circular reasoning?

Question 8 options
Replacing the restated premise with independent evidence — peer-reviewed journals and replication — breaks the circularity. The other options either keep the circular structure, introduce an ad hominem attack, or merely add an appeal to popularity without removing the circular logic.
Q9 15

Question 9: Arrange the parts in the correct order to form a well-structured paragraph that identifies and explains a circular reasoning fallacy in an argument.

Question 9 options
  • This argument commits the fallacy of circular reasoning, also known as begging the question.
  • The premise — that no supplement is more effective — simply restates the conclusion rather than providing independent evidence.
  • The advertisement claims that VitaBoost is the most effective supplement because no supplement is more effective than VitaBoost.
  • To strengthen the claim, the advertiser should cite clinical trial data or peer-reviewed studies demonstrating the product's efficacy.

Drag items or use arrows to arrange them in the correct order.

A clear critical analysis paragraph first presents the argument being examined, then identifies the specific fallacy, then explains why it is fallacious, and finally suggests how the argument could be strengthened with independent evidence.
Q10 15

Question 10: You are writing a formal academic essay analysing logical fallacies in political rhetoric. You encounter the argument: 'The policy is just because justice demands that such policies be enacted.' Which of the following is the most appropriate way to critique this argument in your essay?

Question 10 options
The third option uses formal academic register, correctly identifies the fallacy by name, and explains the circular structure without resorting to informal language, emotional rhetoric, or a different fallacy label. It is the most appropriate critique for a formal academic context.
Q11 15

Question 11: Which statement correctly distinguishes circular reasoning from an appeal to authority?

Question 11 options
Circular reasoning uses its own conclusion as a premise, creating a closed logical loop. An appeal to authority invokes someone's expertise or status as evidence. The correct option accurately captures this distinction, whereas the others either reverse the definitions or conflate the two fallacies.
Q12 15

Question 12: Which version of the following critique is most appropriate for an academic essay on argumentation? The original flawed argument is: 'This investment fund is profitable because it generates profit.'

Question 12 options
The second option uses formal academic register, names the fallacy precisely, explains the structural flaw, and maintains an objective scholarly tone. The first is too informal, the third mislabels the fallacy, and the fourth uses emotional and colloquial language inappropriate for academic writing.
Q13 15

Question 13: Circular reasoning can sometimes be difficult to detect because the premise and conclusion may be worded differently enough to appear as though independent evidence is being provided.

Question 13 options
This is true. Circular arguments often disguise the repetition by using synonyms, paraphrases, or more complex sentence structures, which can make the logical loop less immediately obvious to readers or listeners.
Q14 15

Question 14: A political commentator argues: 'The regulation is unnecessary because there is no need for this kind of regulation.' Why is this argument logically flawed?

Question 14 options
The argument is flawed because saying 'there is no need for this kind of regulation' is just another way of saying the regulation is unnecessary. The premise and conclusion are the same claim expressed in different words, which means no actual evidence or reasoning supports the conclusion. This is the hallmark of circular reasoning.
Q15 15

Question 15: A student's essay reads: 'Renewable energy is the best option for the future because fossil fuels are terrible, and besides, green energy is simply superior to all alternatives.' Which revision best eliminates the circular reasoning while strengthening the argument?

Question 15 options
The second option replaces the circular assertion of superiority with concrete, independent evidence — reduced emissions, declining costs, and job creation — making the argument substantive rather than self-referential. The other options either retain circular phrasing, rely on vague emotional claims, or introduce a different fallacy.

Related Writing Tests

See all →
C1
Argumentative Essay Topics Quiz (Level B2) – Writing Practice
+19 XP →B1
Metaphor Practice (B1-B2) – English Writing Quiz
+16 XP →B2
Quotation Marks Practice (B2) – English Writing Quiz
+16 XP →

More Tests at C1, C2 Level

See all →
mixed Writing
Literary Devices Practice Test (A2-C2) — Writing Exercises with Answers
+30 XP →C1 Writing
Symbolism Writing Exercises: Level C1-C2 (with Answers)
+22 XP →C1 Writing
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Exercises (C1-C2)
+22 XP →
← Back to lesson: Circular Reasoning: Definition and Useful Examples of Circular Reasoning Fallacy